Home
 About Us  Product Info  Distributors  Contact Us
Subsoil Compaction Affects Cereal Crop Yield

SUBSOIL COMPACTION AFFECTS CEREAL CROP YIELD

Wheat and barley crop growth and yield is influenced by the supply of nutrients from soil reserves, organic matter and applied fertilisers, available water and sunlight intensity during the growing season.

The requirement for fertiliser in addition to the soil nutrient reserves is provided reasonably accurately from information based on soil nutrient tests before the crop is planted. Leaf tissue analysis at late tillering may be used to check the adequacy of the nutrient supply, particularly nitrogen and trace elements. However soil tests only represent the top 15 cm of soil or the depth of cultivation. Management of the top 15 - 20 cm of soil has proven adequate for nutrient management but to provide sufficient water for optimum growth, the effective root zone is actually the top 90 cm of soil. Research conducted in Canterbury (Jamieson, 1994) on the effect of drought on wheat and barley measured the utilisation of soil moisture down to 130 cm depth. If adequate water supply is not available to the crop during periods of high evapotranspiration, this is likely to 'cap' the grain yield or the dry matter grown for forage crops regardless of nutrient supply.

Water utilised from different parts of the root zone has been estimated for the growing season. The top 30 cm provides about 40% of the water requirement, 30 - 60 cm depth provides about 30% and 60 - 90 cm provides about 20%. Up to 10% may be utilised from soil below 90 cm if the roots can get down that far.

When crops become water stressed, the yield loss can be as high as 6 to 7.5% per week when evaporation rates are as high as 30mm/week in Canterbury. For a crop with potential yield of 9 t/ha, this is 0.5 to 0.7 t/ha per week.

The amount of water available within the root zone is influenced by soil texture or the relative proportions of sand-silt-clay and the volume of soil in the root zone. For mineral soils, clay and silt loams have the highest water holding capacity at about 60 mm per 300 mm soil compared to sandy soils that retain only about half as much. The effective root zone or rooting depth is often affected by compaction below the cultivated depth and/or low pH or acidity of the subsoil. The amount of water potentially available to cereal crops is determined by the soil texture throughout the top 90 cm of soil, moisture content and the rooting depth. The value of increasing the water holding capacity of the soil where crops will experience moisture deficit conditions is 0.22% of the potential grain yield per mm of deficit that can be averted.

Soil Acidity
Acidic subsoil often has a layer of compaction or a 'pan' that restricts root growth, the level of exchangeable aluminium may be damaging to fine roots, restricting root function and the amount of water available to the crop. Increased nitrate leaching to the groundwater is also associated with increasing soil acidity.

Acidification of soil is an inevitable consequence of growing plants, the process of plant growth has an acidifying effect. Other sources of acidity in soils are the chemical forms of nitrogen fertiliser used. The amount of nitrate leaching down the soil profile is related to the efficiency of utilisation of applied nitrogen and whether the crop is grown for grain or silage. Silage crops have a greater acidifying effect than grain crops due to the removal of basic cations (potassium, magnesium and calcium) as a component of straw. Removal of the 'whole crop' also has a greater impact on soil physical quality compared to 'grain crop' due to reducing soil organic matter levels. Lime requirement to compensate for soil acidification under high yielding cereal crops is likely to be 300 to 600 kg lime/ha/year. This is the same as 1.5t/ha every 3 to 5 years.

Compaction
Growing cereal crops is considered less damaging to soil structure than most other arable crops however soil organic matter levels are lower than for pasture soils and are prone to compaction. The main causes of compaction are cultivating wet soil, the effect of heavy machinery wheel pressures on the soil, physical disturbance of the soil with implements. Grazing livestock, especially dairy cows on winter feed crops may be very damaging to soil structure during wet winter conditions. Compaction risk is higher where soil calcium levels are low. Compaction of topsoil is loosened by conventional cultivation however compaction also affects the subsoil which will affect crop growth, this may have long term effects on soil quality.

Management of the subsoil
The normal practice is to apply lime and cultivate it into the topsoil to achieve appropriate pH and calcium levels from a soil test prior to planting each crop. This is fine for the topsoil but alleviating compaction in the subsoil is more difficult. Gypsum is a good option to lift calcium levels below the normal cultivation depth due to different chemical properties in comparison with lime. This will improve soil structure without raising pH. Use nitrogen fertilisers at appropriate rates and application timing to minimise leaching of nitrate down the soil profile.

Conduct a soil test (Basic Soil test profile + exchangeable Aluminium) from the soil profile below normal cultivation depth or 30 - 60 cm. If subsoil acidity is an issue, the pH and calcium levels will be low and exchangeable aluminium will be high which may combine to restrict root growth. Conduct a visual inspection of the soil profile, looking for any indications of compaction below the normal cultivation depth. Deep ripping is a good option where the pan can be fractured and this process may facilitate the physical movement of calcium down the soil profile however if the underlying cause of the compaction problem is not addressed, this is an expensive short term remedy. Where subsoil acidity is a concern there is reason to increase the target pH and calcium level in the topsoil to minimise the amount of acidity moving down the soil profile.

Application of gypsum at rates of between 3 and 10 t/ha is known to be more effective than lime in moving calcium down the soil profile below the cultivation depth but does not increase soil pH. Combining lime + gypsum as a treatment facilitates leaching of calcium into the subsoil. where pH adjustment is also required, a 60/40 blend of lime and gypsum at about 5t/ha is an option. Incorporation of lime + gypsum by ploughing after application or deep ripping will improve the effect of this treatment. The objective is to increase the potential yield of cereal crops through increased soil water holding capacity, water infiltration rate and root growth.

References

Copyright and Disclaimer Statements   Supported by HortResearch

Top 
home
applying gypsum
gypsum & limestone
organic production
packaging info
plant nutrition
soil improvement
waterborne
why use gypsum
avocado
berryfruit
kiwifruit
stonefruit
olives
pipfruit
viticulture
amenity turf
arable cropping
cereal crops
maize
home gardening
market gardening
effect of dairying on pasture soils
having fun with GIB Plaster of Paris